Category Archives: Peoples Lobby

Clinton vs. Tocqueville

San Diego Review January 1, 1996
In Clinton vs. Tocqueville…

Michael Barone  likens today with Tocqueville’s 1830 preindustrial America.  “Today’s  America, like Tocqueville’s, is decentralized, individualistic, religious, property loving…  it is egalitarian in that people show little deference to established authorities in business, medicine, religion, the media or politics… (its) natural inclination … is to dismantle big government, to decentralize power, to hold individuals rather than society responsible for their actions.”

Barone’s analysis leads to Article I of the Constitution which he stresses is about Congress — not the President  — and indicates that  this apparent restoration of constitutional order  may benefit a perceived ‘indecisive’ Clinton.  The disappearance of  economic emergencies and hot or cold wars has reduced the need for the ‘commanding’ Presidency.  Barone concludes, however:  “If Gingrich and his allies stand firm, the character of American society today and the order of the Constitution will give the president little choice but to accept most of their decisions.”

Whooa, wait a sec.. Might there be a deeper, different  brand of individualism bubbling across America’s plains than indicated by these national brands?

Consider economics:  Through our industrial era, the rich grew richer  off their investments while the blue collars worked enough to raise their own Buick boats. Today owners’ equity grows even bigger as blue collar wages shrink — so:

thousands of  mutual funds and discount brokers opened to give the fading blues a chance to own too

ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans) soared to own United birds flying our friendly skies

franchising roared through the 70’s and 80’s, as fading blues and whites bet their savings on their ability to run a business

network marketing booms in the 90’s, as stay-pressed collars continue investing time and money in pushing today’s more easily delivered products

home offices and garage workshops spread through neighborhoods, as do lap tops and tools of independent trade, and sometimes Uncles Sam can’t even count the exchange

.http and .www become code names for a contemporary band of  freedom fighters who use knowledge as a tool of  economic and political self defense  and we seem more ready to discontinue lending to the poor.

Consider politics:  Political parties had a field day through the 60’s spending or bombing money and making  60 second pol art.  Too slowly, these art merchants noticed rising public disenchantment.  Today MIPS reports that  the percentage of thinking people disliking  parties, campaigns and the governing process is the highest in history.  MIPS (My Intuitive Polling Survey) draws its data from recent surges, such as:

Continuing growth of party times:  Move over Libertarians here come the Reform dancers choreographed by Ross the Boss; the Green Party with the Consumers Top Cop, Ralph Nader, holding Presidential dance tickets; Bradley, Wickert, Tsongas, Penny, Love and gang hanging out around Concord deciding whether to warn Americans that a revolution is coming; and Jesse’s Rainbow again squinting into the sunshine of November 96, days after torrents of tears over Colin’s demur finally cleared.

Resurgence of campaign reform initiative legislation and continued public support for term limits.

Growing support and understanding of  how to establish a national initiative process.

Many of  those working to establish a national initiative have learned from 20+ years of initiative work /study. They now need to raise sufficient funds to be ready to offset the negative campaign that any challenge to the status quo faces.  They need not match the opponents campaign war chest.   They must, however, run a smart campaign with some money.

If not, they might still be noted by Tocqueville’s 1990s standard bearer — the Tofflers?– as a signpost  on America’s plains of individuality, diversity and richness.  They  will not, however, have added enough skill and power to weld an American Constitutional tool for blue and white collar use.

 

Too many tired, hanging curves?

San Diego Review   December 1, 1995

 Too many tired, hanging curves?

By Dwayne Hunn

Sometimes, like my hometown Cleveland Indians,  you get too far ahead of the curve…  When it happens in politics, you also don’t score much.

Getting ahead of too many curves in either game:  1) destroys confidence and passes bench  splinters 2) causes public policy grumbling during commercials of  Married with Children  3) teaches one to persist, adjust and wait till  they slip you a good, crushable pitch.

People’s Lobby  was ahead of  a lot of curves —  reviving the initiative for grassroots organizations, sponsoring initiatives to clean the environment and reform politics, training groups to do the same and  sending men to Washington to implement the national initiative and referendum.  Unfortunately, People’s Lobby’s truly big hitters went  up to the heavenly Big  League, and  for years the National I&R,  was left stranded on political bases.

Today new hitters step up to drive home that biggest political run. Rick Arnold’s highly successful National Voter Outreach,  which did 20 of the 66 initiatives in 1992 and 19 of the 76 that  qualified in 1994, has branched out to form the  American Initiative  Committee, whose goal is  to amend the  National I&R into the Constitution. Former Senator Mike Gravel wants to adopt a National I&R through a 1996 popular vote, re-enacting Philadelphia’s Constitution writing  of 1787.

Barbara Vincent, Director of  the National Referendum Movement (NRM), has another approach.   NRM also has a National I&R goal,  but intends to promote that by bringing the initiative process to the 26 states that still lack I&R rights 24 states possess.  NRM’s approach, dubbed the Tennessee Plan, attacks on three fronts:

1) Legislatures are lobbied to pass I&R legislation, while seeking the governor’s support;

2) Electorates  tests their constitutional right by placing  an issue on the ballot via petition;

3) Courts suits are filed under state and federal  bills of rights when the petition is denied.

In short, if  the politicians won’t pass laws to give  citizens the initiative and referendum, citizens put an issue on  the ballot without an initiative law.  When  the Secretary of State denies their legal ability to do so, they “sue the buzzards.”

Didn’t the King of England learn that  petitioning for redressing grievances is better than going to war?  Wasn’t a foundation of the Constitution the right of redress?   Wasn’t  the Bill of Rights,  ratified in 1791 three years after the Constitution alone was submitted to the states, added to guard against the abuse of people’s rights?  Wasn’t the right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” one of the key phrases in the First Amendment?

Doesn’t the 1983 Civil Rights Law stating, “No one can use even custom as an excuse to violate citizens’ civil rights…” receive its  legal forces from those founding tenets? Our rights emanated from our 1776 Declaration of  Independence, so shouldn’t  logical historians wonder why it took over 200 years for all the states to have the initiative and referendum?

If the three pronged attack doesn’t obtain timely results,  the NRM  has a “big squeeze” contingency that relies on Congressional supporters to pass a Uniform Act establishing the IR process for all the states.  The states would be required to provide initiative and referendum rights to citizens, as states retain discretion to set signature, filling requirements, etc.

Even before the tired but true 42 year old Satchel Page joined the Indians in 1948,  tired  politicians were heaving curve balls to keep the initiative out of  the peoples’ hands. Today, however, more hitters are digging in to crush hanging curves  into the I&R bleachers.

Old School Bus + 20 years: National Referendum

San Diego Review November 1, 1995

Old School Bus + 20 years: National Referendum Realized?

by Dwayne Hunn

In 1976  Roger Telschow and  John Forster  packed up their People’s Lobby literature, training, and maverick politics  in an old yellow bus, crisscrossed 30 states and poured their energy into making the wooden figures in the marbled halls of Washington implement the National Initiative & Referendum.  The results?

In  1977 Senators Abourezk, Hatfield and Gravel (D-AK, 1969-81)  co-sponsored Senate Judiciary  Committee hearings on implementing a national initiative process.  They all expressed support for the idea of  initiative law making, but  Hatfield and  Abourezk didn’t support the initiative amending the Constitution. “Ridiculous!”  Gravel  today responds,  “That means  the employees of people can amend the Constitution,   but people can’t. Ridiculous!..”

In 1977 Rick Arnold’s initiative helped replace  the lessons of  Vietnam and three Bronze and one Silver Stars by learning how to gather signatures and run initiative campaigns.  Today, more than 300 initiative campaigns later, he sees  the  National Initiative  as the  safety  valve  America needs to check systemic cynicism. Today, Gravel and Arnold’s paths increasingly cross, as they pursue the goal of a national initiative, albeit by  slightly different processes.

A three day San Diego October 1995 Campaigns and Elections Conference allowed political experts to hone the skills of  the sponsoring American Initiative Committee (AIC) and Philadelphia II participants, as both organizations approach 1996 intending to make Direct  Democracy available to America.  What’s the difference between AIC and Phily II?

Both want Americans “empowered” with the National Initiative and Referendum (NI&R) and believe a grassroots ground swell will be needed to do that.   Arnold believes that every Congressional district needs an organization gathering signatures and pressuring representatives so that 3/4ths of the states plus 1 (38) will empower Americans by ratifying a simply worded Amendment such as: “The people reserve the right to the initiative and referendum.”

For the 1996 Presidential ballot, Gravel wants a National Initiative and Referendum ballot in every registered voter’s hand.  When one over 50% votes for empowering Americans with those Direct Democracy tools,  Philadelphia I, where Americans in 1787 drafted their   new Constitution without asking permission of  the states under the inept Articles of Confederation, will  have an equally revolutionary and powerful   brother — Philadelphia II..

Gravel’s Phily II  does not, however, leave defining the process for doing national initiatives in the hands of  elected representatives.  Instead, like the Constitution with its articles and sections,  Phily II specifies the what, when and how of the NI&R.  “Governments make it harder to do initiatives, so why leave it in their hands to establish the process. Anyway, I’ve been there (the Senate)  and don’t want to entrust that to them.”

Simple process, complex wording.  Which do you prefer?

HOW MUCH SMOG IS ENOUGH?

San Diego Review October 1, 1995

 HOW MUCH SMOG IS ENOUGH?

By Dwayne Hunn

FROM AN IDEALISTIC KID:

In the late 60’s rookie law school graduate, Roger Jon Diamond,  irked by boyhood memories of smog that sullied his round-ball chasing, decided to file a class action suit “to get rid of smog.” How Quixotic was that?

Perhaps you are a youngster, forgot your  California history, or didn’t notice much  while lifting beers in front of the tube…. If  so,  here’s an authenticated history…

FROM THE POLITICIANS:

The skies of Los Angles were so “yucky” that in January of 1970 State Senator Nicholas Petris’s legislation banning autos from the core of 19 California cities and banning the sale of internal combustion powered cars by 1975 passed the Senate, but failed in the Assembly.

Around the same time, President Nixon took a ride with friend C. B. Rebozo into the hills and dales of Orange County and  the EPA’S  role grew as  he observed: “An area like this will be unfit for living. New York will be, Philadelphia, and, of course, 75% of the people will be living in areas like this… unless we start moving now…

Governor Reagan responded by supporting three measures by Chairman Pete Schabarum (R-Covina), a well endowed recipient of oil lobby money, that  would: 1) regulate the volume of hydrocarbon producing olefins in gasoline; 2) require oil companies to alter chemical composition to benefit smog control devices; 3)  lower taxes on natural gas to encourage use of natural gas powered vehicles.

FROM FOLKS MUMBLING IN SMOG

In vibrant democracies, discussion generally  precedes acceptable solutions to nagging problems.  In this case, the problem had been festering so long that a January 29th 1970 L. A Times editorial claimed an average of 13,000 tons of  pollutants were daily dumped into L.A.’s skies.   Many activist groups complained that many  heart and breathing related deaths in LA were attributable to smog, and not the causes hospitals automatically placed on autopsy-less death certificates.  More and more people heard that those majestic purple hued sunsets had  more to do with nitrous  oxide emissions than mother nature’s colorings.  Environmental science students complained  that spewing lead-based gasoline into the atmosphere was killing the ocean’s phytoplankton, the basic link in the ocean’s food chain and one of the world’s primary oxygen generators.

A few thinkers, without even a crystal ball, kept asking where spent radioactive fission fuel rods, generated from all those proposed taxpayer-insured nuclear power plants, would be disposed.

Some engineering types, not enamored of  the “yuk” trapped in the Los Angeles Basin, proposed drilling giant holes into the surrounding San Gabriel mountains and  constructing huge suction fans at the back end so that the smog could be sucked to the backside desert…  Neighboring Palm Springs held her breath, since those “suckers” would have taken her desert clean breath away.

FROM THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY:

Head of the State Air Resources Board,  A. J. Haagan-Smit, credited with discovering photochemical smog, was intrigued by a General Electric proposal to use hot air wastes from electrical power plants to penetrate the smog inversion layer.   Instead of  cooling the steam from power plant turbines by dumping it into the ocean,  GE proposed building 60’ high by 100’ in diameter towers.

The California Environmental Quality Laboratory proposed a bounty tax on cars based on the miles driven, vehicle age and smog emitted. The Bay Area Air Pollution Control District denied permits to construct 18 service stations “until gasoline stations are zero emitters of hydrocarbons or its quality is better than the air quality standard.”  This was a precursor of today’s gasoline vapor trapping pump hardware.   In the 70’s, the nozzles of  3,600 stations in the Bay Air Pollution District evaporated 75 tons of hydrocarbons daily into the atmosphere.   Gigantic plumes of  heated air would rise through these super donuts presumably dragging with them two cubic feet of smoggy air for every cubic foot of air in the plume.  The sucking fans never got placed, but anyone know what happened with this smokestack plan?

Don  Quixote and his good stead  girded themselves for battle, took deep breaths, got up a head of steam and tilted with windmills.  Rookie lawyer Roger Jon (Quixote) Diamond  collected his legal books, took a shallow breath on a smoggy day, and filed a class action suit.  He didn’t tilt with sucking  mountain fans, huge smokestacks and the millions of piston driven, flame-spewing dragons.  Instead his lawsuit challenged  LA County to enjoin the polluters  — auto manufacturers, cement companies, oil refineries — from polluting the air.

In August of 1969, neophyte Jon Quixote thrust and parried in pursuit of his elusive dream, and Judge Lloyd Davis ruled, as the grown-up experienced world would expect, that the problem of air pollution in Los Angeles County was too complicated for the courts to address.

Did little Roger grow up, get real, pack up his childhood dream of kids chasing round-balls under blue skies  — and  go home to live in suburbia?  Nope. He kept gathering  technical and legal information on pollution and building his Clean Air Council of like minded dreamers,..

Boxers, lawyers and politicians win big fights in similar ways. A boxer can have a good jab, parry well in the ring, but  without  the ability to deliver a thudding knock out in a big fight, most of the crowd, jury or  legislature pay  little attention. Roger  needed a thud, and he wasn’t far from meeting the manager/promoter who knew how to set up the big fight.

Faster & more clairvoyant than previously reported

Faster and more clairvoyant than previously reported….

San Diego Review, Dwayne Hunn, September 1, 1995

In last month’s (8-1-95) Review, regarding the 1968 Koupal lead Recall of Governor Reagan, I stated:

At signature filing time, Governor Reagan was in Florida at the Republican National Presidential Nominating Convention.  By 10:00 p.m. Florida time (7:00 p.m. California time), Governor Reagan announced that the recall effort had gathered only 550,000 of the required 700,000 signatures needed to place it on the ballot.

Well, Canon Ball Berg, corrected my reporting of those events by explaining that Reagan announced the shortfall at 10:00 a.m. Florida time, the morning before Berg filed the bundles of recall signatures in Sacramento that evening at 5:00 p.m.

Ah, if Intel only knew who had that faster-than-reality computer chip back then….or  what magic really brews…

California cruisin’…

California cruisin

San Diego Review, September 1, 1995, Dwayne Hunn

As a young person living in the midwest during the ‘60’s,  music, television and news left one with visions of  “woodies” cruising beaches filled with beautiful bronzed “California girls” under skies speckled with mountains and palm trees in temperatures that were always warm, but not sweaty.  The economy boomed,  and Hollywood left you with a Vance Packardized image that everyone swooned over California….

Those images weren’t easily forgotten, especially after two years working in Bombay’s slums with the Peace Corps.  So, when I was lucky enough to received a fellowship to Claremont Graduate School, about 40 miles east of Los Angeles, I came to California…  Traveling east from Bombay via Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam, Japan, and Hawaii, the roads, cars and buses became a barometer of lifestyles.  They grew bigger, fancier and faster right up to California,  where my gears stuck in reverse culture shock, as comfortable homes and  smooth freeways zoomed by my air conditioned bus window.

Graduate school and high school and college teaching helped  temper the culture shock, but something about perfect California kept gnawing  at me.

Near Claremont is another bucolic town called Glendora,  where I lived my southern California years.  I lived on a 2+ acre funny pharm, nestled at the base of the San Gabriel foothills, where a number of us helped build a castle.  I lived there for several months with my eyes wide open, before the fabled Santa Anna winds came through around November.  The Santa Annas blew the air overhead away, out into the Pacific Ocean for the plankton to ingest.  And lo and behold, what had been a single row of mountains riming the pharm was clearly three finely etched ranges deep. That discovery, and the scent of fresh air, prodded me to increase studying and lecturing on air pollution and the environment.

Back then most California kids  didn’t concern  themselves much with air pollution.  Under those weather caster defined “hazy skies” they were enjoying the good life hanging out, chasing girls, surfing, beaching, partying, smoking, etc.  Now and then their good times would leave them with a stunning, educational revelation,  like when some of my  high school students returned from the other side of the mountain ranges after enjoying a star-studded, desert camping trip.  “There were like a million stars up there!  God, there were so many stars I couldn’t believe it!”

Yeph, they had been raised in the Los Angeles basin.   At night they saw hundreds of stars — the others Carl Saigon counted had been smogged out.

To a midwestern guy accustomed to clear, blue skies it didn’t seem like many California students or graduates knew or cared about air pollution.  But ….  it only takes a few and a dedicated core more to turn the sky upside down.

“Below the inversion layer, it’s just brown and yucky

                                           stuff.”

As a kid growing  up in Los Angeles in the 50’s, Roger Jon Diamond loved playing football, baseball and basketball.  He hated smog.  Neither his folks, buddies or teachers cared about air pollution, but as the years moved him to manhood his distaste for it grew into a crusade to erase it. “When I took my first air plane flight, then it   really dawned on me how much the smog was — cause you could see the inversion layer.  Once the plane gets above the inversion, it’s like a whole new world — you could see blue sky above the inversion layer.  Below the inversion layer, it’s just brown and yucky stuff.”

His concern didn’t leave after becoming an attorney.  As Roger put it on one of People’s Lobby’s recent  public affairs television productions, “I had always been involved in environmental issues.  That was my dream — to clear up the air in Southern California.  Growing up as a kid in Los Angeles, I learned first hand  about smog and air pollution.  When  I graduated from UCLA Law School in December of  ‘66, I decided to do something about air pollution. I filed a class action suit.”

Come back next month, if you think daring lawyers can fix anything  from smog to plumbing to  12 point deficits with only 2:11 left ….   San Diegans know that lawyer Steve Young can do at least 2 out of three of  the above, right?  Can Roger go three for three?

Can’t Recall Government?

San Diego Review August 1, 1995

Can’t Recall the Government?

Then Let’s Recall the Smog!

by Dwayne Hunn

 In the summer of 1968 Edwin and Joyce Koupal were immersed in gathering signatures to recall Governor Reagan, which included the complex, time-consuming re­quirement of matching the gathered signatures with names and precincts. (Thanks partially to the later efforts of People’s Lobby, that laborious cross filing process is no longer required.)

In that same summer Ronald Reagan threw his hat into the presi­dential ring, which pit the rookie, charismatic, right-hook develop­ing governor of the nation’s most productive state against the come­back, cagey and savvy. inside-the-ropes conniver, Tricky Dick Nixon. The last thing not-yet Teflon-protected Governor Reagan needed as he stepped in­side the presidential ropes, was a successful recall campaign mounted by a 41-year old high school drop-out and political nov­ice, who had just registered to vote.

Cannon Ball Berg, Ed’s side­kick, recalls the August 1968 day when they delivered the recall sig­natures to the Secretary of State’s office just before the 5:00 p.m. closing time. To this day, Canon Ball Berg remains amazed at the counting efficiency of the Secre­tary of State’s office in that pre-computer age.

At signature filling time, Governor Reagan was in Florida at the Republican National Presidential Nominating Convention. By 10:00 p.m. Florida time (7:00 p.m. Califor­nia time), Gov. Reagan announced the recall effort had gathered only 550,000 of the required 700,000 sig­natures needed for the ballot.

Well, the former used car sales­man had taken his jazz man antics into big time politics and failed. That, however, didn’t cause him to pack up the band and find a real job. Instead, the recall campaign, which the Koupals had based in Los Angeles, where the people were exposed to the wretched air. And Edwin Koupal, the kid who probably left for the mer­chant marines before he took a high school civics class, pinned the blame for the putrid, smog filled air on — the politicians.

The Koupals began learning about smog from a mostly silver-haired led group called Stamp Out Smog. Soon they became leaders and soon formed their own group— People’s Lobby.

If you think low-lead gas, nuclear power plant construction moratori­ums, banning DDT usage, and lowered sulfide oxide emissions from diesel fuel are beneficial envi­ronmental developments — then read some of the upcoming columns. The Koupals and People’s Lobby may have done more than any other individuals and organization to move California and the nation into embracing those changes.

Too strong & smart to punch back

San Diego Review June 1, 1995

 Too strong & too smart to punch back

 by Dwayne Hunn

Before Ed left his thriving used car sales manager’s busi­ness, he got an out-in-the-field taste of what his style of in-your-face political confrontations would bring. Ed’s work often

had him doing television commer­cials. On this day, one of the Sacra­mento stations had just finished a commercial with him on Saugstead’s ‘The Hill” dealership. Afterwards, Ed made a few frank remarks about Senator Lunardi. The reporter used in the commercial was a friend of the Senator’s and took exception to Ed’s stinging remarks. The reporter ripped some slashing remarks back at Ed, to which Ed, with one of the quickest tongues in the West, tartly replied.

After more sizzling reports, the reporter bloodied Ed’s mouth Ed, barrel-cheated with a workman’s arms, didn’t strike back. Instead, Ed pinned the reporter to the ground, dripped blood on his shirt and necktie, and pumped him with straight talk as Ed’s car-selling skydivers filled the reporter’s heaven-bound eyes rather than punched up stars. There was little the reporter could do— the politician and others to follow, like the skydivers, were set up by Ed to fail.

Soon Ed took his jazzman’s improvisation, set-up routine, cut­ting tongue and forthright insights into the big boys’ political arena.  For most of the white or black knighted political gladiators who joined the contest, the results re­sembled those on the “The Hill.”

Flushing and stepping in it

 

San Diego Review June 1, 1995
 Flushing and stepping in it

  more of the story of Ed Koupal, People’s Lobby founder

 by Dwayne Hunn

 By the early 60’s the standout young kid who grew into an exceptional jazz musi­cian was now a super used car sales manager with a posh sub­urban home. Comfortable and non-voting, he epitomized the “silent majority.” Then Ed flushed once too often.

Hearing some gurgling sounds and sniffing some pun­gent odors from his subdivision’s bowel move­ments, Ed got his political feet wet and dirty in sewer agency politics when he learned that some sweet smelling home owners in his subdivisions were not paying there fees. He also learned that a related economic beneficiary was an industry player who helped supply the nation’s lifeblood —   Sunset Oil.

Sunset Oil wanted to de­velop nearby Whitney Ranch in Rockland. The company conveniently proposed, with the assistance of a bill pro­posed by Senator Lunardi, that a district be created within a district — which the taxpay­ers of Placer County would have to support. Users of this district would get a lot more than just free sewer usage. To Ed and his neighbors this seemed like another scam and their group, the Tommy Knockers — named after Irish elves who warned miners of impending shaft dangers, brought a $26 million suit to plug the shaft.

After tasting the sewage of politics, Ed rolled out of the silent majority’s bed. His senses would never be the same. His subsequent politi­cal acts proved that.

What sensible politician neo­phyte would respond to little old ladies asking him to get rid of newly-elected Governor Reagan in the mid 60’s? So what if the ladies complaints centered around Reagan’s proposed elimination of 3,700 jobs at hos­pitals, elimination of fourteen state outpatient clinics, and the assumption of community men­tal health care by county centers and similar cuts in welfare and educating programs? What could a used car salesman, a voting neophyte, do to the hand­some governor of America’s most powerful state?

Well, as practical wife Joyce pointed out, when about half the people get upset with someone —        something can be done. Around that dissatisfaction level, which L4 Times editorials helped build, Tommy Knockers Ed, Joyce and Cannonball Berg vis­ited with Nancy Paar in San Fran­cisco, who had once tried to re­call Reagan. After disagreeing as to whether a Recall Reagan campaign should be run from San Francisco or Los Angeles, the Tommy Knocker contin­gent split for where the smoggy numbers lived — to recall a cinematic charismatic con­nected governor.

The Koupals left a comfort­able lifestyle. Their kids would never again have the traditional family outings or closeness. Politics without the perks in­undated their lives — crusad­ing on a shoestring budget be­came their livelihood.

From a group of youthful political idealists, they grew a shrewd, street-savvy staff. From the open-minded of Cali­fornia, they grew a national cli­ent base of initiative produc­ers. To the likes of Ralph Nader and Jerry Brown, they taught political karate that Harvard, Yale, seminaries, Zen and good government groups hadn’t even envisioned.

Quotes:Lowenstein & Holtman

San Diego Review June 1, 1995
Quotes from Lowenstein & Holtan

By Dwayne Hunn

 Quotes from some participants in People’s Lobby’s upcoming educational video series on Campaign Reform & Politics.  Periodically, thought provoking or informative quotes  from these videos will be printed in the Review.

Dan Lowenstein is a UCLA Law Professor and was first Director of the Fair Political Practices Commission.  The FPPC was established by Proposition 9 of 1974 which People’s Lobby initiated. The triumphriate of People’s Lobby, Common Cause and  gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown carried it to a 70% electoral victory.

On campaign reform, contributions limits and public financing elections: 

“What I think would be a better approach would be to give the democrats and republicans in the legislature a significant amount of money that they (their parties) can divide  up among their candidates as they see fit.  That way there are no strings attached in terms of subsidizing my (or anyone’s) private contribution, which may be a special interest contribution. Secondly, money will be used efficiently, where we can get some real competition.  Because that’s another problem people are concerned about — there’s not enough competition.

“This way the parties can fund some real challenges to incumbents on both sides.  You know, give some incumbents some clean money to defend themselves, and we’ll have some real competition in those races.  That would be a better system.  If we did that we’d get a lot of electoral competition and use the money efficiently. We could limit contributions to say $100. or $50, so we would really eliminate the special  interest element.”

Sometime in June of ‘95, Common Cause is expected to announced the launching of a Campaign Reform  initiative campaign.  Ruth Holton, Executive Director of California Common Cause said:

“We are going to have spending limits…. We think the key to reform is having contributions limits and spending limits. Contributions limits alone force a candidate to spend that much more time raising money and really advantages those candidates who have the largest network of people who can give at the highest amount.  Now if you think about that, those people are incumbents.  So contributions limits alone really benefit incumbents.  What you need is spending limits to help balance the scales,  so that everyone gets to only raise a certain amount.  Then after that  they can spend their time actually — walking precincts, talking to voters, such an unusual concept these days….

“But the Supreme Court has ruled that you can not have mandatory spending limits.  You have to provide some kind of incentive to candidates to participate in the spending limit system and  the spending limit system has to be voluntary.

“So the incentive we will be providing  is:  Candidates that abide by spending limits will  be allowed to receive double the amount in contributions than a candidate that doesn’t…”